Legal Opinion
Vitale v. City of Kansas City, Mo.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 26, 1988No. 86-0597-CV-W-6PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SACHS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Vitale seeks judicial review of a Federal administrative order refusing to give the necessary consent to payment (from contributed Federal funds) incidental to the state-court condemnation of premises on which his restaurant was located. He originally sued the City of Kansas City but was met by a challenge that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was a necessary or indispensable party. Vitale v. City of Kansas City, 701 S.W.2d 213 (Mo.App. 1985). 1 After plaintiff joined HUD in his fourth amended petition, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matz v. Miami Club Restaurant (Mo. 1939)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DockerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Cooperative Services, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Certain PropertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. 40.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Henry CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newton County Wildlife Ass'n v. RogersDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
- Ackerley Communications of Florida, Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Young v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Ackerley Communications Of Florida, Inc. v. Kaye HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989