Evans v. Marsh
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
The actions in this appeal were brought to recover alleged damages to real estate. The substance of the actions is the same and they are treated together. Demurrers were sustained to second amended petitions, and plaintiffs appeal.
Omitting formal parts, it is alleged that Stonehouse Drainage District No. 1 of Jefferson county is a duly organized corporation under *44Laws 1905, ch. 215, and acts amendatory thereto, and that defendants, Sturm, Baker and Hoekstra, were presuming to act as officers 'for and on behalf of the drainage'district on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Kansas City v. SlangstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Grentner v. FehrenschieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Gresty v. DarbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Cunningham v. BlytheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Hicks v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Commercial Union Insurance v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Hendrix Ex Rel. Smith v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Tillotson v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Atteberry v. RitchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.