Legal Opinion

Gresty v. Darby

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1937No. 33,222; No. 33,223PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was.delivered by

Harvey, J.:

These were actions in tort to recover damages for permanent injury to land. They were filed separately in the district court of Scott county, but have been consolidated in this court because of the identity of the legal questions involved.

In the Morris case plaintiff alleged in his petition that he is the owner of a described 400 acres of farm and pasture land; that White Woman creek is a natural watercourse which flows from the west in an easterly direction across a state highway known as U. S. No. 83, and from that point easterly about…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Longstreet v. County of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Heman Construction Co. v. CapperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Hicks v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Barker v. Hufty Rock Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Hendrix Ex Rel. Smith v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API