Legal Opinion

Tillotson v. Fair

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1945No. 36,376; No. 36,378; No. 36,379PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

These are consolidated actions for damages wherein the.plaintiffs expressly state in their petitions they base their right to recover from the defendants personally on one cause of action only, namely, in tort for violation of their rights in and to an alley and certain lots abutting thereon, resulting from the construction of a drainage ditch in, over, and upon such alley and make no claim against the state of Kansas. The defendants demurred to the petitions as amended. The demurrers were sustained and the plaintiffs appeal.

*83The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. WollardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Gresty v. DarbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Cunningham v. BlytheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Kretchmar v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Buckwalter v. School District No. 42Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Medeiros v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Valley Forge Gardens, Inc. v. James D. Morrissey, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Hendrix Ex Rel. Smith v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Kern v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API