Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberson

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 19, 1995No. ACM 31090PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MORGAN, Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of larceny, nine specifications under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and one specification of disobedience of a general regulation.1 He was acquitted of a single specification of rape and another Article 134 specification. Before us he urges, as he did at trial, three errors: 1) four specifications of Charge III (Article 134) should be consolidated by reason of multiplicity; 2) the military judge erred in not giving credit for illegal pretrial confinement; and 3) he…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. RedlinskiU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. DolbowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. RobersonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. BriggsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. ClementeUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API