Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberson

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 18, 1997No. ACM 31090 (f rev)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON FURTHER REVIEW

OPINION OF THE COURT

MORGAN, C.H., II, Judge:

In our first treatment of this case, found at United States v. Roberson, 43 M.J. 732 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App.1995), we granted some relief on the basis of multiplicity. There we held that separately charging larceny of a handgun and the ammunition for it, where both were taken at the same time and place, was multiplicious, and that transportation and storage of the same firearm was multipli-eious under Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856, 105 S.Ct. 1668, 84 L.Ed.2d 740 (1985).

In an aside, we remarked that appellant had also been charged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  2. United States v. BoddieUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  4. United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API