Legal Opinion

United States v. Clemente

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 8, 1997No. ACM 32360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MORGAN, J.H., Judge:

Appellant was convicted in accordance with his pleas of six specifications of attempted larceny, thirteen specifications of larceny, and one specification of stealing and opening mail. Officer court members sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, 12 months confinement, and reduction to E-l. Finding merit to one of the five assignments of error raised by appellant, we modify the findings and reassess the sentence.

Assigned Errors

Appellant’s assignments of error are: 1) the military judge erred by denying a defense motion to dismiss various charges based…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. SpearsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  3. United States v. BurtUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API