Legal Opinion

Nordin v. Wedler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1948No. Civ. No. 16168Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

This is an action by the plaintiff for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. The appeal is from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant. There is no averment in the complaint that the contract is just and reasonable as to the other party or that it is supported by an adequate consideration. There is no evidence in the record as to the value of the land or any evidence upon which any estimate as to its value or the adequacy of the consideration could be based. As the remedy sought in an action for specific performance is an equitable one, it is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Windsor v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mayer v. BeondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Salisbury v. YawgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Caspar Lumber Co. v. StowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Haidopoulos v. WoollettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API