Legal Opinion

Eagle Printing & Publishing Co. v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1926No. 15875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C-

Numerous errors are assigned in the petition in error filed in this court, but in the brief and argument only one error is relied on for reversal. It is insisted that the trial court erred in permitting oral evidence to be introduced to vary and change the terms of the contract of partnership, and that because of this error the trial court committed the further error of refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The only question presented and argued in the brief is the legal effect of a certain written contract executed by L. H. Chandler and L. E. Patterson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Gilbert v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Barricklow v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Futoransky v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Purdy v. Miller Hunter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Payne v. PrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WidickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API