Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Miller Hunter Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1923No. 14571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, 0.

The controversy in this action grows out of a cross-petition died by' defendants in error, Miller Hunter Company, against plaintiffs in error, A. H. Purdy and A. J. Combs, who were defendants in an action wlierein Henry Hill sued the said A. H. Purdy and A. J. Combs and Miller Hunter • Company, in the district court of Creek county, for the cancellation of a tax deed and possession of certain land in which said action a .-judgment was rendered in said court in favor of the plaintiff Henry Hill, and against each of said, defendants canceling the tax deed and restoring the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Garber v. HauserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Moore v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Smith v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lambert v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Comar Oil Co. v. RichterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Eagle Printing & Publishing Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Cook v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API