Legal Opinion

At & T CORP. v. Faraday Capital Ltd.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 5, 2007No. 236, 2006PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal we consider one aspect of the coverage afforded under certain directors and officers and company liability policies (the D & 0 policies). The insured seeks coverage, under multiple primary and excess policies, for defense costs and other expenses arising out of two stockholder suits. The Superior Court granted partial summary judgment to the insurers, holding that each lawsuit under consideration constitutes one “Claim,” and that both claims were barred under the policies’ prior litigation exclusions, among other reasons. We conclude that the trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Northwestern National Insurance v. Esmark, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Matulich v. Aegis Communications Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Langdale Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  3. Adedipe v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  4. EMSI Acquisition, Inc. v. RSUI Indem. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  5. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. v. XL SpecialtySuperior Court of Delaware · 2025

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API