S.E. Johnson Companies, Inc. v. Jack
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant S.E. Johnson, Inc. ("S.E. Johnson") appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Michael L. Jack and Amy S. Jack (collectively "the Jacks"). We affirm.
ISSUES
S.E. Johnson raises the following issues that we restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred by denying SE. Johnson's motions for judgment on the evidence based upon its assertion that the State of Indiana, as the owner of the highway, had accepted S.E. Johnson's work at the end of each day, thereby extinguishing any duty S.E. Johnson, an independent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blake v. Calumet Construction Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Marquez v. MayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hitachi Construction MacHinery Co. v. Amax Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hill v. Rieth-Riley Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. BlakesleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. JackIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Pope v. Hancock County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Pryor v. HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Swan Lake Holdings, LLC v. HilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Pryor v. HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002