Legal Opinion

Marquez v. Mayer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2000No. 49A04-9906-CV-247PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Raul Marquez, M.D. (“Marquez”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment on the evidence and its denial of his request for a set off against the verdict in favor of Charles Mayer (“Mayer”).

We affirm.

ISSUES

Marquez raises three issues for our review, which we restate as:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying Marquez’s motion for judgment on the evidence on the issue of proximate cause.

2. Whether Mayer is judicially es-topped from opposing Marquez’s request for a set off against the verdict.

3. Whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Hammes v. BrumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Manns v. State of Indiana Department of HighwaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. BeatyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Gregory and Appel, Inc. v. DuckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. RLG, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. PSI Energy, Inc. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Services, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Hill v. RhinehartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Depew v. BurkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API