Legal Opinion
Pryor v. Hoskins
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 2002No. 18A02-0109-CV-608PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Ronald L. Pryor, Sharon R. Pryor, and Gaylon Ward (collectively, “the truckers”) appeal the jury verdict for Berdie Hoskins in her personal injury action against them.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
ISSUES
1. Whether the trial court erred in denying the truckers’ peremptory challenge of a juror.
2. Whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury about comparative fault and giving the jury only two verdict forms (rather than three).
8. Whether the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury about the statutory requirement for equipment on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Miller v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Bond v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FullerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Carlos Villaruel v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Pryor v. HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002