R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. Jack
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
BOEHM, Justice.
In Mendenhall v. Skinner & Broadbent Co., Inc., 728 N.E.2d 140 (Ind.2000), this Court held that under the Comparative Fault Act no credit should be given to non-settling defendants for amounts paid for the same injury by settling defendants who were not non-party defendants at trial. This case presents the question explicitly left unresolved by that opinion: under Indiana's comparative fault regime, where defendants are severally lable, does a defendant who goes to trial get credit for amounts paid by nonparty defendants who settled the plaintiffs' claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Control Techniques, Inc. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Mendenhall v. SKINNER AND BROADBENT CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Estate of Spry v. Greg & Ken, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. JackIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Services, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kinslow v. GEICO Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Dennerline v. AtterholtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Estate of Helms v. Helms-HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Denton v. Universal AM-CAN, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.