Legal Opinion

R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. Jack

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2002No. 49S02-0112-CV-658PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

In Mendenhall v. Skinner & Broadbent Co., Inc., 728 N.E.2d 140 (Ind.2000), this Court held that under the Comparative Fault Act no credit should be given to non-settling defendants for amounts paid for the same injury by settling defendants who were not non-party defendants at trial. This case presents the question explicitly left unresolved by that opinion: under Indiana's comparative fault regime, where defendants are severally lable, does a defendant who goes to trial get credit for amounts paid by nonparty defendants who settled the plaintiffs' claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Control Techniques, Inc. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mendenhall v. SKINNER AND BROADBENT CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Estate of Spry v. Greg & Ken, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. JackIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Services, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Kinslow v. GEICO Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Dennerline v. AtterholtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Estate of Helms v. Helms-HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Denton v. Universal AM-CAN, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API