Legal Opinion

Locomotive Engineers & Conductors Mutual Protective Ass'n v. Bush

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1979No. 1182PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Justice.

This is a suit for benefits on an insurance contract. Appellee Bush brought suit against appellant claiming he was entitled to payments under an insurance contract which provided for per diem payments for loss of wages by being unemployed because of discharge or suspension as a penalty or disciplinary measure. Appellant answered that appellee was precluded from recovery because of the policy exceptions. Trial was to the court, and judgment was rendered for appellee in the amount of $4,770.00 and attorney’s fees of $1,750.00.

Appellee was employed by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United American Insurance Company v. SelbyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. v. WallgrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Hatch v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. St. Regis Candies, Inc. v. HovasTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Stitt v. Locomotive Engineers' Mutual Protective Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grant v. Southwestern Electric Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Montgomery v. Browder, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  3. Ranger Insurance Co. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. TV-3, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
  5. Parker Plaza West Partners, a Texas General Partnership v. Unum Pension and Insurance Company, F/k/a Union Mutual Pension and Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API