Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Browder

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 30, 1996No. 07-96-0104-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

In this appeal, appellants Jack and Mike Montgomery seek reversal of a summary judgment in favor of appellees Josephine Browder; Josephine Bruyere; Elizabeth Rolfes; Patty Nell Carver, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Frances Appleby; and Geraldine Tennant, individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Maude Browder (the Browder Group). Appellants advance six reasons why the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellants entered into…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Edds v. Mitchell, Admr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Steger v. Muenster Drilling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Gupta v. Eastern Idaho Tumor Institute, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  3. McCreary v. Bay Area Bank & Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Cooley v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Sanders, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API