Legal Opinion

Stitt v. Locomotive Engineers' Mutual Protective Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Assumpsit by Raleigh K. Stitt against the Locomotive Engineers’ Mutual Protective Association under an indemnity policy. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the circuit court of Bay county to recover an indemnity of $15 per week, during 33 1/3 weeks, for loss of time by being out of employment, under an indemnity policy issued to him by defendant. The case was tried December 16, 1912, before a jury. The testimony was mostly documentary; plaintiff being the only witness sworn. The trial resulted in a judgment for defendant on a directed verdict, and, after denial of a motion for a new trial, plaintiff removed the proceedings to this court for review upon a writ of error.

When insured, plaintiff was a locomotive…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Briggs v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Locomotive Engineers & Conductors Mutual Protective Ass'n v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. In Re Contempt of Emil SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Droste v. Nash-Kelvinator CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1946
  5. Mueller v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API