Legal Opinion

St. Regis Candies, Inc. v. Hovas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1928No. 4880PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge NICKELS

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.

Xanthull owned a plant and business. He became associated with ' four other men for corporate purposes. They incorporated as St. Regis Candies, Inc. Xanthull’s plant and business, at an agreed valuation, became the property of the corporation received in payment for 510 shares of “Class A Stock” and forty shares of “Class B Stock” of the corporation. The other associates on their part subscribed for the remaining 490 shares of “Class A Stock” and 210 shares of “Class B Stock.” Inferably — they…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Williams v. Gaines, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. Castillo v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Ireland v. CraggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Locomotive Engineers & Conductors Mutual Protective Ass'n v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API