Legal Opinion

Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 13, 1982No. 175A81PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Plaintiff filed complaint on 10 October 1979 seeking damages for injuries sustained when his hand was caught in the gears of a yarn crimping machine owned by his employer, Mill Yarns, Inc. of Hickory. This Barmag False-Twist Crimping machine was purchased from defendant on 6 April 1971, and plaintiff was injured on 3 June 1977. Plaintiff alleged that defendant had negligently designed, manufactured and installed the machine and had breached warranties of merchantability and fitness.

Defendant responded with a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment under Rules 12(b)(6) and 56…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Burmaster v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 2Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API