Legal Opinion
Overland MacHined Products, Inc. v. Swingline, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 6, 1964No. Civ. 27032PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.
Two New York corporations executed a written contract with a California corporation, and later a purchase order based on the written contract, for the manufacture of certain stapling devices. A third corporation, a California corporation, having all of its stock owned by the minority stockholders of one of the New York firms, actually merchandized the products in California.
The New York corporations were purportedly served with process in the instant action by service on the president of the California corporation as “general manager” in this state for the New York firms. The latter firms…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Sims v. National Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- James R. Twiss, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Hitt v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
- Khachatryan v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Buckner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Twinco Sales, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.