Legal Opinion
Twinco Sales, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1964No. Civ. 22104PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Petitioner (Twinco) seeks writ of mandate to compel respondent court to quash service of summons (Code Civ. Proc., § 416.3).
Twinco is a Minnesota corporation, with its principal office in St. Paul. It manufactured exercising devices, some of which it sold to S. S. Hollender, Inc., of Chicago, Illinois. Hollender sold 150 of these articles to real party in interest, Broadway-Hales Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation which operates retail stores in California. At Hollender’s direction, Twinco shipped them to California. Colleen Kinsler bought one from Broadway-Hales and sued that retailer in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Waco-Porter Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Williams v. Canadian Fishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- DaSilveira v. Westphalia Separator Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Leach Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Thys Co. v. Harvard Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965