Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. McCall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1945No. 6 Div. 322PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.,

This proceeding involves the allowance of an attorney’s fee from the estate of a decedent. It was begun by a petition of Bethea McCall, as coexecutor and cotrustee, which was filed in a cause in equity styled “In the Matter of the Estate of Edward Wilkinson, deceased.” The appellant, Edward Wilkinson, Jr., is one of the executors and trustees named in the will of the decedent. Bethea McCall, appellee, was appointed as successor to the appellant’s sister, Mrs. Elizabeth Lanier, by decree entered on November 16, 1942. She was the other executor and trustee named in the will.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Taylor v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Coker v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Keith & Wilkinson v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Skirven v. SkirvenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Graddick v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. King v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Western Grain Company CasesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Riley v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API