Legal Opinion

Keith & Wilkinson v. Forsythe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 23, 1933No. 2 Div. 29PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The will of Alex K. Cawthon, deceased, was admitted to probate. It is not set out in this record, but it does appear incidentally that Margaret C. Forsythe was named as executrix without bond, and letters were issued to her, said to be the daughter and only next of kin to testator.

Soon afterwards Charles A. Patterson filed a petition and alleged that he was the owner of a judgment which had been rendered against decedent, and that “he verily believes that his interest in said estate will be endangered for want of security.” This was filed to invoke the benefit of section…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. King v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Ex Parte AshtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Kimbrough v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Stone v. Gulf American Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API