Legal Opinion

King v. Keith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1952No. 2 Div. 292PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*466SIMPSON, Justice.

This record has been read and considered in general consultation and the court has concluded to' this result.

The appeal challenges the decree of the circuit court, in equity, allowing appellee Keith fees and expenses for services rendered by him as an attorney at law to the estate of Alice DeVane King, deceased.

The appellants are Frederick D. King, individually and as administrator cum testamento annexo of said estate, and J-. Ploward McGrath, Attorney General of the United States, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian. Since submission, James P. McGranery, present…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Faulk & Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Clark v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Steiner v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Graddick v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. ARMY AVIATION CTR. FED. CREDIT U. v. PostonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Beal Bank, SSB v. SchilleciSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Lanier v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API