Legal Opinion

In Re Watson

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 29, 2003No. 14-03-00377-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.

On March 20, 2003, the trial court found relator Brannon K. Watson in contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support. He was sentenced to 120 days in jail (criminal contempt), thereafter to remain in jail until he paid $558 in child support and $83 in costs (civil contempt). 1 It is undisputed he has made the latter payments.

The trial court’s order contained the proviso that Watson’s “sentence shall be served as set out in Exhibit ‘A’ attached hereto and incorporated herein for all pur poses.” Exhibit A provided that his sentence should be served…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Ex Parte ShakleeTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ex Parte RoosthTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ex Parte QuevedoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Anascavage, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  2. In Re Kirpal Singh, and Kulwant Singh Nagra v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
  3. In Re Natin Paul v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
  4. in Re Scott Lee Stanley, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API