Ex Parte Shaklee
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this habeas corpus proceeding, relator challenges his confinement for violating a divorce decree. Because the trial court’s contempt order does not clearly specify the incidences of contempt the court found or the punishment it imposed, we hold that relator’s confinement does not comport with due process. Accordingly, the Court orders relator discharged.
Relator Richard Shaklee and Mary Bre-land divorced in 1993, with Breland receiving custody of their two children. The divorce decree requires Shaklee to share use of a “four-wheeler” with his children as follows:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Ex Parte ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1966
4Cited by25 opinions
- In Re LongTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Bos v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Shagufta Khan v. Salim Valliani and Agha Juice and Cafe, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- In Re Mott, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.