Ex Parte Roosth
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The trial court found relator in contempt for failure to pay child support and sentenced him to 180 days in the Harris County jail. Although the sentence was punitive rather than coercive, the trial court did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt of relator’s ability to make the support payments. The commitment order also purported to deny relator credit for good behavior. We released relator on bond pending final disposition of his petition. We grant in part the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Relator claims that the trial court imposed a criminal sentence without due process of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kopeski v. MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Kubena v. HatchTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Ex Parte AclyTexas Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- In Re Stein, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- In Re Anascavage, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- In re SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- In Re Watson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.