Legal Opinion

Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 14, 2020No. 13-821Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13–821 (Filed Under Seal: 6 January 2020) (Reissued for Publication: 14 January 2020) * *************************************** INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL * CENTER et al., * * Plaintiffs, * v. * Work Product Doctrine; Motion to Compel; * RCFC 26(b)(3). THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * *************************************** Alexander J. Pires, Pires Cooley, Washington, DC, with whom was Gregory A. Brodek, of counsel, Duane Morris LLP, Bangor, ME, for plaintiffs. A. Bondurant Eley, Senior Trial Counsel, with whom were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API