Legal Opinion
Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 5, 1988No. LGBC 863, LGBC 864, LGBC 865 CA A44848 (control), CA A44849, CA A44850, LGBC 871 CA A45837, LGBC 873, LGBC 874, LGBC 875 CA A46545 (control), CA A46546, CA A46547PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners have filed separate petitions for review of seven orders of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission (commission) approving the annexation to the City of Eugene (City) of portions of an unincorporated area known as Santa Clara. The petitions were consolidated into three groups for purposes of briefing and oral argument and, because the issues presented are substantially the same, we have consolidated them for the purpose of this opinion.
City makes several preliminary arguments. It contends, first, that the petitions for review were not timely filed or properly served.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- City of East St. Louis v. TouchetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Cooke v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Donaldson v. LANE CTY. L. GOV. BDRY. COM'NOregon Supreme Court · 1990