Legal Opinion

Wilmington Shipping Co. v. States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 11, 1964No. A.R.D. 174; Entry No. 126, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNloN, Judge:

On application of appellant (plaintiff below), we have reviewed the decision of the trial judge. He dismissed these appeals to reappraisement, holding that they were filed before ap-praisement and, hence, were not lawfully filed under the provisions of section 501, Tariff Act of 1930.

When the reappraisement appeals were called for trial in Wilmington, N.C., defendant moved to dismiss them on the ground that they had been prematurely filed. The official papers were received in evidence on defendant’s motion, as were also certain documentary exhibits offered by plaintiff (exhibits…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. Gothic Watch Co.United States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Reid v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Wilmington Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API