Legal Opinion

Razatos v. Colorado Supreme Court

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1984No. 82-2516PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Peter Razatos, an attorney suspended from practice by the Colorado Supreme Court, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982). He seeks a declaratory judgment that the Colorado procedure for disciplining attorneys violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and a hearing to clear his name. He asserts that under the Colorado attorney discipline scheme, the Colorado Supreme Court makes the final fact determination as to whether an attorney should be disciplined. He argues that this scheme violates the Fourteenth Amendment because due process…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Facio v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Ritter v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re: Robert B. SurrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Centifanti v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Mounkes v. ConklinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API