Legal Opinion

Gassman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1976No. L. A. 30582PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board (the Board) of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for two years on conditions of probation, including actual suspension for the first six months.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1962 and has no prior disciplinary record. He was charged with the violation of his oath and duties as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6103, 6067, 6068), the willful violation of rule 9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar (present rule 8-.101, commingling of clients’ funds), and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Abeles v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Alkow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hamilton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API