Legal Opinion

Freding v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1929No. 27,185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction and discharging a restraining order.

Plaintiff is a resident, citizen and taxpayer of the defendant city of Minneapolis, a municipal corporation of Minnesota, operating under a home rule charter adopted in pursuance of art. 4, § 36, of the state constitution. The other defendants are the mayor, aider-men and other named officers of the city. Plaintiff alleges ownership of certain described real estate abutting on University avenue in said city (the locus of the improvement hereinafter referred to) and instituted this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. A. A. White Townsite Co. v. City of MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Peterson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. McKeen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Installation Company v. University CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Gadey v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Shortridge v. DaubneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Coyle v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Coyle v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API