Legal Opinion

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1927No. 26,383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant city from completing condemnation proceedings instituted pursuant to L. 1925, p. 676, c. 417, to acquire certain lands belonging to the plaintiff for the purpose of widening a city street.

The statute gives a right of appeal to the district court from the order of confirmation of the city council. We are unable to see that the plaintiff may not get appropriate relief upon appeal. If so an injunction should not he granted. Plaintiff’s brief states that an appeal has been taken.

Order…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freding v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Peterson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API