Victaulic Co. v. Tieman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
This is a classic case of jumping the gun. The dispute centers on a covenant not to compete between an employer and former employee. All parties admit that the employee is violating the covenant; the question is whether it is unreasonable, and thus not appropriately enforced through an injunction. Because reasonableness is a fact-intensive inquiry, we hold that it should not have been determined on the pleadings. After resolving that we have jurisdiction over the interlocutory dismissal of claims related to the covenant because it effectively denied a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by417 opinions
- Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Monroe v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- James Turnell v. Centimark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. BotticellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
412 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.