Legal Opinion

Hagen v. Barry

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

No question is raised on this appeal as to sufficiency of proof of the alleged fraud. For the purposes of the appeal, therefore, it must be deemed to be proved, and our statement of the ease will proceed upon this theory. Plaintiff Hagen inherited, some years ago, 240 acres of land, 160 acres of which constituted the farm upon which he lived. This is the farm, title to which was acquired by the defendant. Hagen was a man comparatively ignorant and inefficient. For many years, the defendant had purported to aid him and to advise him. He had loaned him money, and for many years had been his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mallory v. LeachSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  2. Koch v. RhodesMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hudson v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doujotos v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Timmerman v. GurnseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Ankeney v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Oswalt v. CronkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. United Forest Products Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API