Legal Opinion

Ankeney v. Brenton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1931No. 40878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

Harry B. Ankeney, the plaintiff-appellant, a man now about seventy-two years old, previous to the commencement of this action had engaged in the Linseed Oil business for approximately fifty years. This business was carried on by the appellant through many different organizations. However, in 1912, he assisted in organizing as an Iowa corporation, the Ankeney Linseed Manufacturing Company. Associated with him in that corporation were a Mr. Parrott and a Mr. Sears. Thereafter, in 1916, Mr. Ralph Bolton became a stockholder in the corporation and bought the interests of Parrott and Sears.

The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  2. Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Bottorff v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Browning v. RodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Graham v. First American National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  3. McNeil v. NofalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hilco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API