Hudson v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
At Law. .Action by Guy H. Hudson, special administrator of the esíaícof Hah or Engemoen, against the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. Ou deceudant’s motion for a directed venid. Arltoni for damages for negligent delay In tho transportation of two shipments of' live stock from Montana points to Chicago, via South St. Paul.
Read the full summary
At Law. .Action by Guy H. Hudson, special administrator of the esíaícof Hah or Engemoen, against the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. Ou deceudant’s motion for a directed venid. Arltoni for damages for negligent delay In tho transportation of two shipments of' live stock from Montana points to Chicago, via South St. Paul. Tho iiiie:1, of railway over which tho snipnionte actually passed were Groat Northern Railway from Montana points to South St. Paul, Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway from South St. Paul to Elroy, and Chicago & Northwestern Railway from…
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This motion by the defendant for a directed verdict is based upon two grounds, as 1 understand it, and in substance they are these: First, that the defendant railway company in the two particular shipments involved in (his controversy was the intermediate common carrier in interstate commerce, that the cause of action stated rests upon delay by the common carriers, or some of them, and that the evidence in this case not owy fails to show that the delay occurred on the line of the defendant .common carrier, but affirmatively shows that there was not any such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Clegg v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Looney v. Oregon Short Line RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- McArthur v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Hagen v. BarrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. Houston Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.