Legal Opinion

Makinen v. George

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1943No. 29032PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by Elmer Makinen, as administrator with the will annexed de bonis non of the estate of his wife, Elsie Makinen, for the purpose of obtaining a decree requiring Helen George, daughter of Elsie Makinen by a former marriage, to account for and pay over to plaintiff the proceeds of two one thousand dollar United States saving bonds, registered in the name of Mrs. Elsie Fohr Makinen, payable on death to Mrs. Helen Fohr George.

The complaint, in paragraphs one to six, inclusive, alleges the following facts, which are admitted in the answer: Plaintiff is the surviving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Decker v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wright v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re the Estate of HammerWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Brucker v. De HartWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brown v. Snohomish County Physicians Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Golberg v. SanglierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Arneman v. ArnemanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bell v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API