Legal Opinion

Mecartney v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 7, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,361PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richabd W. Cliffobd, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

The ordinance in this case provided that the cost of the improvement should be paid by special assessment to the extent that property legally benefited thereby could be legally assessed, and that the remainder of such cost should be paid by general taxation.

The ordinance in People ex rel. v. Hyde Park, 117 Ill. 462, and Hyde Park v. Corwith, 122 id. 441, provided that the entire cost of the improvement should be paid by special assessment. In each case the municipality, after the filing of the petition in the condemnation proceeding, took possession of the property. In the case first cited a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Thatcher v. Village of Hyde ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Meeker v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. MegartneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  2. Mecartney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  3. Mecartney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API