Legal Opinion

Mecartney v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,711Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthiix, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

By the first proposition of law submitted by the plaintiff and marked “held” by the trial court, the court held, as a matter of law, that the city had been negligent, prior to the bringing of the present action, in performing its duty to levy, collect and pay over such special assessments as it lawfully could to the owners of said condemnation awards for the property taken. By the second proposition of law the court held, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff had proved a valid cause of action against the defendant for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BarbianIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Willoughby v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. City of Chicago v. ThomassonIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Chicago v. WilloughbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mecartney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API