Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Megartney

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Merritt W. Pinckney, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

In July, 1893, the City Council of the city of Chicago passed an ordinance providing for the opening and widening of South Park avenue between Garfield boulevard and Fifty-sixth street by condemning the east thirty-seven feet of three lots owned by appellant and others. One section of the ordinance provides that “said improvement shall be made and the cost thereof paid for by special assessment to be levied upon the property benefited thereby to the amount that the same may be legally assessed therefor, and the remainder of such cost to be paid by general taxation, in accordance with Article…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Muhlker v. New York & Harlem RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. City of Chicago v. BarbianIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Co. v. TetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Winkelman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mecartney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API