Legal Opinion

Meeker v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsi t.—Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

The only question requiring consideration is whether an action of assumpsit can be maintained against the city of Chicago, defendant in error, to recover the amount awarded as compensation for land sought to be taken in the condemnation proceeding.

It has been repeatedly held that the city has the right to abandon the condemnation and the improvement. It is under no legal obligation to pay the compensation awarded unless it shall choose to do so. It can not, however, lawfully take possession of the property unless with the owner’s consent, until it has so paid. City of Chicago v. Hayward, 176…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Thatcher v. Village of Hyde ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. City of Chicago v. HaywardIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. GatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Village of Hyde Park v. CorwithIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Denver, W. & M. Ry. Co. v. AdkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Mecartney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  3. City of Chicago v. MegartneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. People v. LampleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API