Huydts v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
At issue in this appeal is the constitutionality of the guest statute, section 42-9-101, C.R.S. 1973, and the question of whether an issue of fact precluded the trial judge from granting summary judgment, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 56. Plaintiffs-appellants Connie and Jean Huydts appeal from an order of the district court which granted summary judgment to the defendants-appellees Joselyn and Lester Dixon and the plaintiffs-appellees Becky and Harold Kelty. The trial court held that the Huydts failed to establish that Becky Kelty acted with a willful and wanton disregard of the rights of others in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Keasling Ex Rel. Keasling v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Fritz v. Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Vogts v. GuerretteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Cronk v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. TroelstrupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. CaroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.