Legal Opinion

Huydts v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 25, 1980No. 28040, 28050PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

At issue in this appeal is the constitutionality of the guest statute, section 42-9-101, C.R.S. 1973, and the question of whether an issue of fact precluded the trial judge from granting summary judgment, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 56. Plaintiffs-appellants Connie and Jean Huydts appeal from an order of the district court which granted summary judgment to the defendants-appellees Joselyn and Lester Dixon and the plaintiffs-appellees Becky and Harold Kelty. The trial court held that the Huydts failed to establish that Becky Kelty acted with a willful and wanton disregard of the rights of others in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Keasling Ex Rel. Keasling v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Fritz v. Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Vogts v. GuerretteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Cronk v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. TroelstrupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. People v. CaroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API