Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Troelstrup

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1990No. 88SC489PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

The question before us is whether a person who has been convicted of sexual assault on a child and is subsequently sued by the child can look to his homeowner’s insurance policy for coverage, when the policy excludes coverage for “bodily injury ... intentionally caused by an insured person.”

The petitioner, Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the respondent, Glenn Troelstrup. 1 Troelstrup filed a counterclaim alleging that Allstate had improperly handled the child’s claim against him. 2 The trial court granted Allstate’s motions…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fire Insurance Exchange v. BentleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. National Casualty Co. v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API