Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. Foster
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This is an action in equity brought by the plaintiff to enforce restrictive covenants against the defendants. After a hearing, the Master (E. Paul Kelly, Esq.) recommended that the covenants should be held unenforceable and that a temporary and permanent injunction should issue to prevent the plaintiff from enforcing any of the provisions of the restrictive covenants. This recommendation was upheld by the Superior Court (Johnson, J.), which reserved and transferred the plaintiff’s exceptions. We overrule the plaintiff’s exceptions.
The plaintiff is the largest accounting firm in both New…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- George W. Kistler, Inc. v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Solari Industries, Inc. v. MaladySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Faw, Casson & Co. v. CranstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1977
- Farm Bureau Service Co. of Maynard v. KohlsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- BDO Seidman v. HirshbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Young v. VegaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.