A. Dicillo & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of Appeals
Geauga County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THOMAS, J.
Filed against a township board of zoning appeals, this action designated a “petition in appeal,” appeals a decision of defendant board on the ground that said decision was un*514reasonable and unlawful. Defendant board, by motion requests that the petition be made more definite and certain “by stating in what manner the decision rendered by the defendant board was unreasonable or unlawful.” The propriety of this motion is the question to be decided.
If this action involved an original cause of action — as distinguished from appeal — generally accepted principles of definiteness…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Water Service Corp. v. Water Power & Control CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Matter of Collins v. BehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- New York State Guernsey Breeders Co-Operative, Inc. v. NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- McClanahan v. Cochise CollegeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Allesandro v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Ohio Real Estate Commission v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
- Hardy v. HorstSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1951
- Wright v. BayowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1957