Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wright v. Bayowski

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1957No. 3905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By PHILLIPS, J.

On plaintiff’s complaint filed with the Austintown Zoning Board of defendants’ violation of the Austintown Township Zoning Ordinance the Austintown Township Zoning Inspector wrote Andrew Emil and E. Eugene Bayowski the following letter dated March 12, 1954:—

“Gentlemen:
“This is to notify you of the decision of this office regarding your place of business and possible violations incurred. After consideration of all data presented, this office is of the opinion that:
“(1) The building on Lot No. 4 is in violation, being used as an auto repair shop. From your statement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kahler-Ellis Co. v. ClineLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1954
  2. Randolph v. First Baptist ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. A. Dicillo & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of AppealsGeauga County Court of Common Pleas · 1950
  4. Hardy v. HorstSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santesson v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Santesson v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API