Legal Opinion

Arcade Realty Co. v. Bank of Commerce

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1919No. S. F. No. 8070PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This action was brought by the Arcade Realty Company against the defendant bank to recover $2,650 paid by defendant upon cheeks drawn in favor of the Arcade Realty Company by C. W. Phillips upon the defendant bank. Phillips assigned his claims thereon against the hank to the plaintiff. The question involved in the case is the authority of one A. W. Clement to indorse such checks on behalf of the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defend-' ant, upholding the -authority of Clement to make such indorsements, and plaintiff appeals. Clement was the appellant’s agent for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Jackson v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hamilton National Bank v. NyeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. National Fence-machine Co. v. HighleymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Rosser-Moon Furniture Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Santa Marina Co. v. Canadian Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API